According to the official website of the personnel bureau of the chinese academy of sciences, the party group of the chinese academy of sciences was dismissed from comrade li zhigang’s post as a member of the party group of the chinese academy of sciences by receiving the notice organization department of the communist party of china central committee to the party group of the chinese academy of sciences (group ren zi [2017] no. 106). According to the data from the figure Library of China economic network, Li Zhigang, male, born in 1954, was once the discipline-team leader of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a member of the Party group. On April this year, the official website of the personnel bureau of the chinese academy of sciences released a message saying that sun also served as a member of the party group of the chinese academy of sciences and the discipline-team leader of the central commission for discipline inspection in the chinese academy of sciences, removing li zhigang from his position of discipline-team leader of the central commission for discipline inspection in the chinese academy of sciences. Resume of Li Zhigang Li Zhigang, male, Han nationality, born in 1954, from Heilongjiang. He graduated from Tsinghua University, majoring in High Voltage Engineering and Technology, and is a researcher. He served as deputy director of Institute of High Energy Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, director of comprehensive planning bureau of Chinese Academy of Sciences, secretary general of Chinese Academy of Sciences, discipline-team leader of Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in Chinese Academy of Sciences and member of Party group. He was a visiting scholar at University of Syracuse in the United States and participated in CLEO II International Cooperation. He was a guest professor at Fermi National Laboratory in the United States and participated in an international cooperation group composed of 5 countries and more than 10 units. He has been engaged in research work on high voltage technology, high energy test physics, detectors and other aspects for many years. From April, 2017 to May, 2017, he served as a member of the leading Party group of Chinese Academy of Sciences. According to the official website of the personnel bureau of the chinese academy of sciences, the party group of the chinese academy of sciences was dismissed from comrade li zhigang’s post as a member of the party group of the chinese academy of sciences by receiving the notice organization department of the communist party of china central committee to the party group of the chinese academy of sciences (group ren zi [2017] no. 106). According to the figures Library of China economic network
Tag: 爱上海HFB
Supreme Law releases Belt and Road cases: first recognition of Singapore Court judgment
On May 15, the Supreme People’s Court reported the second batch of 10 typical cases related to the construction of “The Belt and Road Initiative”. In a foreign-related commercial dispute, the Chinese court recognized and executed the commercial judgment of the Singapore court for the first time. “In the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative, the rule of law is an important guarantee and the role of Justice is indispensable.” Liu Jingdong, vice president of the Supreme Court of France and the people, said that according to the precedent of the Singapore court’s recognition and enforcement of the Chinese court’s judgment, the case was determined for the first time that there was a reciprocal relationship between China and New Zealand, then, according to the principle of reciprocity, the commercial judgment of Singapore court is recognized and executed. GOL Group is a joint stock limited company established in Switzerland. In June, 2016, it applied to Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court of Jiangsu province to claim that it and Jiangsu textile industry group Import and Export Co., Ltd. (textile group for short) due to disputes arising from the sales contract, both parties reached a settlement agreement. Due to the failure of textile group to fulfill the settlement agreement, Gol group filed a lawsuit with Singapore High Court according to the jurisdiction clause, and the court made an effective judgment. As textile group and its property are located in China, Gol group submitted to Nanjing intermediate court for recognition and enforcement of Singapore’s judgment. During this period, Textile Group stated that the treaty on civil and commercial judicial assistance signed by China and Singapore did not provide for mutual recognition and enforcement of court decisions and decisions, GOL group’s application should be rejected. Nanjing Intermediate Court of Jiangsu found out that textile group did not appear in court after being legally summoned by Singapore High Court. Singapore High Court made a default judgment on October 22, 2015, ordering textile group to pay Gol group 350000 dollars, interest and fees. Textile Group also received the judgment. “In January, 2014, Singapore’s High Court recognized and executed the civil judgment made by Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court in Jiangsu.” Nanjing intermediate people’s court believes that china and singapore have not concluded or jointly participated in international treaties on mutual recognition and implementation of effective civil and commercial judicial instruments, however, because Singapore’s High Court has executed the civil judgments of Chinese courts, according to the principle of reciprocity, Chinese courts can recognize and enforce the civil judgments of qualified Singapore courts. “The judgment involved in the case does not violate the basic principles of Chinese law or national sovereignty, security and social public interests.” Based on this, Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court ruled on December 9, 2016 to recognize and enforce the aforementioned judgment made by Singapore High Court. The surging News noted that according to the provisions of Article 182 of the Civil Procedure Law, the basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments is international treaties or the principle of reciprocity. However, at present, China has signed judicial assistance treaties for mutual recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments with less than one third of the countries along the Belt and Road. “Whether there is a reciprocal relationship between the two countries is crucial to whether the commercial judgments of the courts of the countries along the line can be recognized and executed in Chinese courts.” Liu Jingdong said that since the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative, in July 2015, the Supreme Court issued several opinions on the People’s Court providing judicial services and guarantees for the construction of “The Belt and Road Initiative” to strengthen top-level design and plus-sized policy guidance, guide the national court to serve and guarantee the construction of “The Belt and Road Initiative. After the implementation of the above opinions, the Supreme Court successively issued “regulations on the scope of cases accepted by maritime courts”, “Regulations on maritime litigation jurisdiction issues” and many other judicial interpretations and “opinions on providing judicial guarantee for the construction of pilot free trade zones”, so as to unify the application of laws and clarify the rules of judgment, create a fair and just high-quality judicial environment for the construction of “The Belt and Road Initiative. [PUFA Station]] Civil Procedure Law Article 211 if a judgment or ruling made by a foreign court with legal effect requires recognition and enforcement by the people’s court of the people’s republic of china, the parties may directly apply to the intermediate people’s court of the people’s republic of china for recognition and enforcement, the foreign court may also request the people’s court for recognition and enforcement in accordance with the provisions of international treaties concluded or joined by the country and the people’s republic of china, or in accordance with the principle of reciprocity. Article 1982 the people’s court shall, in accordance with the international treaties concluded or attended by the People’s Republic of China, make judgments and decisions with legal effect made by foreign courts applying for or requesting recognition and enforcement, or if, after examination in accordance with the principle of reciprocity, it is considered that it does not violate the basic principles of the laws of the people’s republic of china or the sovereignty, security and social public interests of the country, the enforcement order shall be issued if it is determined to recognize its effectiveness and needs to be executed, in accordance with the relevant provisions of this law. Those who violate the basic principles of the laws of the People’s Republic of China or national sovereignty, security and social public interests shall not be recognized and implemented. 1784 on May 15, the Supreme People’s Court reported the second batch of 10 typical cases related to the construction of “The Belt and Road Initiative”. In a foreign-related commercial dispute, the Chinese court recognized and executed the commercial judgment of the Singapore court for the first time. In Zone 1